THE SYMPOSIUM AIMS TO STUDY AND ANALYZE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST THAT CAN BE APPROPRIATELY RESOLVED BY THE JUDICIARY. ANALYZING LEGAL TREATMENT AS A RESPONSE FOR THE QUICK AND EFFECTIVE RESOLUTION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BECOMES ESSENTIAL, GIVING RISE TO VARIOUS RESOLUTION METHODS, FROM SELF-HELP TO STATE JURISDICTION. THE INTENTION IS TO ANALYZE THESE METHODS [SELF-HELP, SELF-COMPOSITION (CONCILIATION AND MEDIATION) AND HETERO-COMPOSITION (ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION)]. WITHIN THIS CONTEXT, DRAWING ON DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP, THE AIM IS TO DISCUSS THE FACTORS BEHIND THE CRISIS AFFLICTING STATE JURISDICTION AND ITS INSTRUMENT, THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, AS WELL AS THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL OBSTACLES TO ACCESSING THE JUDICIARY AND TO RESOLVING THE CONFLICTS INVOLVED. BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION ENCOMPASSES NOT ONLY ACCESS TO THE JUDICIARY, BUT ALSO THE WAYS IN WHICH THESE CONFLICTS ARE RESOLVED IN THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME, NEVER LOSING SIGHT OF THE SOCIAL PACIFICATION IN WHICH IT IS INVOLVED. A HIGH NUMBER OF QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN OBSERVED, SPECIFICALLY REGARDING THE BINOMIAL OF EFFECTIVENESS AND DELAY IN THE PROVISION OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION; THUS, THE OBJECTIVE OF THE RESEARCH IS GROUNDED IN THE SEARCH FOR FORMS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION THAT ARE QUICK, EFFECTIVE, AND CONDUCIVE TO SOCIAL PACIFICATION.
